How to deliver an improved UK agriscience sector outside of the EU

Rothamsted Research and the NFU convened a workshop identifying the key areas of focus in order to have a world leading agriscience sector in the UK after Brexit.

Rothamsted Research and the NFU convened a workshop at Rothamsted Research amongst leading agricultural science, technology and knowledge transfer organisations in the UK. The workshop discussions focused on identifying the key areas of focus in order to have a world leading agriscience sector in the UK after Brexit. The statement below summarises the emerging recommendations from the workshop.

Recommendations

The case for investment in the agrifood science base has been made by the AgriFood Technology Council and Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund consultation. In a UK outside of the EU, agricultural science and research has an opportunity to work to an improved model and become more effective at delivering what is needed. On the basis of the UK government not contributing to the EU budget and CAP, a proportion of the available budget should be invested in agricultural science in the UK in order to make farming highly competitive in the new market environment. Building on the success of the AgriTech strategy, there are potentially opportunities ahead for investment models in agricultural science in order to maintain the UK as a leader in the field internationally. To achieve high-returns of that investment, the following interlinked issues and challenges must be addressed, by Government, research community and private sector:

Improved funding models and mechanisms should be set up, which will:

  • Facilitate and encourage greater collaboration and accelerate leaner science with more concrete outputs by being more strategic, simpler, less bureaucratic, and more joined-up and accessible;
  • Balance better between the needs of fundamental, applied and translational research and development, specifically addressing the particular needs of agriculture for longer term approaches;
  • Be based on an agreed calculation of how much the UK should be spending on agricultural research, relative to our competitors and to meet our productivity, efficiency and environmental goals; Enable continued access to EU and international funding streams, through negotiating the optimum status and position of the UK in mechanisms such as Horizon 2020;

UK agriscience must look at and learn from funding mechanisms that are working well in other countries, in other sectors and at various scales, including models that are demand-driven and better integrate levy-based support for research, knowledge exchange and skills development with government investments.

Policy across all parts of Government and its agencies should be aligned to deliver an improved model for agriscience, through:

  • Being very clear about what the challenge and goals are for UK agriculture, and ensuring research and innovation strategies can support and deliver solutions;
  • Demonstrating return on investment of agricultural research in terms of performance and competitiveness, for businesses, economy, environment and wider society; This will also require better impact measures and incentive systems for science organisations and scientists.
  • Attracting a skilled labour force for science, industry and farming;
  • Channelling investment programmes within new domestic agriculture policy to support KE, extension, on-farm innovation and adoption of new practices and technologies;

UK policy should seek to provide effective frameworks that are conducive for both responsible innovation and international competiveness.

Collaboration and join-up should be increased, between:

  • Research organisations, including Agritech Centres
  • Funders and their funding mechanisms
  • Public/academic, private/industrial sectors, including farm businesses and NGOs
  • Countries, in EU and internationally
  • Government departments and agencies, and their policies

Effective coordination and collaboration will require long term and reliable funding mechanisms, demonstrating value, driving culture change, providing career opportunities and facilitating genuine knowledge exchange (KE) between and within all these “parties”.

Outcomes and measures of success in better collaboration, funding and policy include more impactful research, with faster adoption, greater return on investment, long term wealth creation, boosting agricultural productivity, and leading to more innovative farm businesses able to seize new opportunities and adapt to change.

Notes to Editors

The following organisations attended the workshop and engaged in the development of these recommendations:

ADAS

AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board)

Agrii

Agrimetrics

Agri-Tech East

AIC (Agricultural Industries Confederation)

AICC (The Association of Independent Crop Consultants)

Bayer AG

CPA (Crop Protection Association)

Cranfield University

Harper Adams University

IBERS (Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences)

Innovate UK

John Innes Centre

LEAF (Linking Environment and Farming)

NFU (National Farmers’ Union)

NIAB (National Institute of Agricultural Botany)

Rothamsted Research

BBSRC and Defra representatives as well as Anthea McIntyre, MEP West Midlands, attended the workshop as observers.

'The Real Beef about Meat'

Rothamsted Research, in collaboration with other leading UK research institutions, presents the ‘The Real Beef about Meat’ at the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition.

Rothamsted Research plays a part in shaping Europe’s sustainable energy future

Having made a significant contribution to a new world report on sustainable bioenergy, Professor Angela Karp is to speak at the 2015 EU Sustainable Energy Week Policy Conference in Brussels.

Rothamsted Research embarks on an ambitious future with a new leadership team in place

Four senior directors have been appointed to work with Rothamsted Research’s director and chief executive, Professor Achim Dobermann, towards shaping the Institute’s future vision and strategy.

How should the valuable resource that is livestock slurry be stored?

New research considers the impact of mechanically separating livestock slurry into a liquid and solid fraction during storage on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions.

Pages

Rothamsted Press Office

For further information, please contact:
Professor Angela Karp (comms@rothamsted.ac.uk), Tel: +44 (0) 1582 938 855

About Rothamsted Research

We are the longest running agricultural research station in the world, providing cutting-edge science and innovation for over 170 years. Our mission is to deliver the knowledge and new practices to increase crop productivity and quality and to develop environmentally sustainable solutions for food and energy production.

Our strength lies in the integrated, multidisciplinary approach to research in plant, insect and soil science.
Rothamsted Research is strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)

About BBSRC

BBSRC invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.

Funded by Government, BBSRC invested £473M in world-class bioscience, people and research infrastructure in 2015-16. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

More information about BBSRC, our science and our impact.
More information about BBSRC strategically funded institutes.