Biodiversity benefits of GM maize are likely to be reduced but not eliminated by forthcoming ban on triazine weed killers

Research just published in Nature


Research just published in Nature (1) by the scientific consortium behind the GM farm scale trials (2) concludes that the comparative benefits for biodiversity from GM herbicide tolerant (GMHT) maize are likely to be reduced but not eliminated by the forthcoming EU withdrawal of triazine weed killers.

The recent Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops reported greater weed abundance under GMHT maize compared to conventional maize crops as a result of the different weed management practices in the two crops. This result led to recommendations from the ACRE (3) Committee that growing GMHT maize would not result in adverse effects. However, the consortium and ACRE both expressed concern that the forthcoming withdrawal of triazine weed killers will lead to changes in conventional weed control that might reduce or even reverse this comparative benefit of GMHT.

This study used data from the Farm Scale Evaluations to analyse the effect of different weed killer spraying regimes in conventional maize crops on key biodiversity indicators. A large reduction in weed numbers was found when atrazine was applied before the maize crop had emerged from the ground. Other patterns of conventional weed killer use were less effective, but still reduced weed numbers more than the weed control practised in the GMHT maize. The index measuring the relative benefit to biodiversity of GMHT management compared with conventional management was reduced by one-third. Senior author, Professor Joe N. Perry said: "The consistency of this reduction across a range of biodiversity indicators gives us confidence to forecast future effects".

Considerable information is available on likely replacements for triazine weed killers in conventional UK maize crops. The authors used this to predict weed numbers in conventional maize crops following the withdrawal of triazines in the EU. Professor Perry said: "We conclude that the comparative biodiversity benefits from GMHT maize cropping would be reduced, but not eliminated by the withdrawal of triazines in the UK".



Notes to Editors

1) Nature reference: (DOI: 10.1038/nature02374).
2) The Consortium comprises; Rothamsted Research, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Scottish Crop Research Institute
3) Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment

Questioning the feasibility of the “4 per 1000” goal to sequester carbon in soil and slow climate change

International group of leading scientists suggest goal is unattainable in many situations, but still good for improving soil quality.

Wood pellets enhance ecosystems and raise renewable energy prospects, says international report

Study marks a controversial stand in a lively, ongoing debate about the sustainability of biomass derived from forests.

The BBSRC invest in Rothamsted Research’s science strategy

BBSRC invests £50.9M in support of excellent agricultural science at Rothamsted Research to address grand challenges faced by farmers and society for the sustainability of food production and the environment.

How to deliver an improved UK agriscience sector outside of the EU

Rothamsted Research and the NFU convened a workshop identifying the key areas of focus in order to have a world leading agriscience sector in the UK after Brexit.


Rothamsted Press Office

For further information, please contact:
Professor Angela Karp (, Tel: +44 (0) 1582 938 855

About Rothamsted Research

We are the longest running agricultural research station in the world, providing cutting-edge science and innovation for over 170 years. Our mission is to deliver the knowledge and new practices to increase crop productivity and quality and to develop environmentally sustainable solutions for food and energy production.

Our strength lies in the integrated, multidisciplinary approach to research in plant, insect and soil science.
Rothamsted Research is strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)


BBSRC invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.

Funded by Government, BBSRC invested £473M in world-class bioscience, people and research infrastructure in 2015-16. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

More information about BBSRC, our science and our impact.
More information about BBSRC strategically funded institutes.