Key Research Findings

1. Soil health and flood prevention

1a:  Livestock grazing improves soil health and thereby reduces the chance of floods

Fig .1a ‘French drain’ water capturing system at North Wyke.

caption spacer

Each additional cow on pasture has been shown to enable the soil to retain further 360 L/ha/yr of water, rather than losing it downstream along with dissolved nutrients

[Takahashi et al., 2018, Animal].

spacer

spacer

1b.  Maintaining soil health, in turn, also helps animals grow more efficiently

Fig. 1b Relationship between soil organic carbon and the animal performance observed at each grazing field. 

caption spacer

The positive correlation between soil organic carbon and animal weight gain highlights the importance of soil management in livestock farming

[Takahashi et al., 2018, Animal].

spacer

spacer

spacer

2. Practical solutions for sustainable livestock systems

2a: Clovers can help cut down the carbon footprint of cattle and sheep farms

Fig. 2a Carbon footprint of animals reared at North Wyke is measured at an unprecedentedly high resolution.

caption spacer

The white clover-based system has been shown to be environmentally more efficient as it is not responsible for greenhouse gases produced during the synthesis of nitrogen fertilisers. 

[McAuliffe et al., 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production].

spacer

spacer

2b: If you decide to test your soil, you might as well do it right

Fig. 2b Newly identified relationship between the number of soil samples collected and the accuracy of animal growth forecasting.

caption spacer

Infrequent spot sampling commonplace in the industry is unlikely to provide useful information.

[Takahashi et al.,2018, European Federation of Animal Science].

spacer

spacer

spacer

3. Informing agricultural policy in the UK and beyond

3a: There are 'green' cows and 'not-so-green' cows

Fig. 3a Carbon footprints of individual cattle and their growth performances. 

caption spacer

Less polluting animals are also economically more profitable, suggesting that environmentally sustainable grazing management is commercially feasible. 

[McAuliffe et al., 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production; Balmford et al., 2018, Nature Sustainability].

spacer

spacer

3b: Contrary to common belief, beef may be greener than chicken if consumed responsibly

Fig.3b Carbon footprint of grass-fed beef and free-range chicken per weight of meat (left) and per contribution to recommended daily intake of 12 essential nutrients (centre). 

caption spacer

The reversal is due to high levels of iron, zinc, vitamin B12, omega-3 fatty acids and other beneficial nutrients found in grass-fed beef. Beef also requires less land suitable for arable production (right). 

[McAuliffe et al., 2018, Food and Energy Security; Lee et al., 2018, European Federation of Animal Science].